Payment Processing for IBM i

Cut Payment Costs.
Keep the Setup You Trust.

Whether everything runs on IBM i, or you're managing payments across multiple systems, EZPayManager/400 and EZPaySuite both cut the cost and risk of paper-based payments — see which one fits how you're actually set up.

15 minutes. No obligation. No slide deck — just your payment process.

40+ years building software for IBM i
4,000+ organizations
Positive Pay fraud protection built in
PAYMENT_COST_LOG
// CHECK → ACH → RECONCILE10:42 AM
Vendor Payment Run — Batch 2241
214 payments processed today
LIVE
Paper checks38 · $2.25 each
ACH electronic176 · $0.15 each
Positive PayMatched, no exceptions
82% of today's volume moved electronically
Reconciled · No manual lookups

You've already seen the math — checks run over $2.25 a transaction, ACH runs under 15 cents. This is the conversation that turns that gap into a plan.

No generic sales pitch. Just a 15-minute walkthrough of what closing that gap could actually look like — starting from the systems you run today, not a hypothetical rebuild.

Which one is right for you

Two products. One problem. Different starting points.

Neither requires the other. Pick based on what you're actually running today.

If everything runs on IBM i · EZPayManager/400

Runs natively on IBM i

EZPayManager/400 prints checks, sends ACH, and generates remittance directly from your existing spool files — no separate platform to run or maintain.

Positive Pay & check audit log, built in

Every check tracked automatically, with fraud verification files generated for your bank — no bolt-on security product required.

If you run multiple systems or ERPs · EZPaySuite

One platform across every system

EZPaySuite connects to IBM i alongside Dynamics GP, Sage 100, or whatever else you run — one unified place to manage payment output, not a separate process per system.

Vendor self-service portal

Vendors enroll in ACH, check payment status, and manage their own details through a secure web portal — instead of your team handling every enrollment by hand.

Why now

The gap doesn't close on its own.

Most finance teams already know ACH is cheaper. What keeps the conversion stuck at "some vendors" instead of "most vendors" is the manual work of enrollment, reconciliation, and fraud checks — not a lack of belief in the math.

This session isn't a generic demo. It's a working conversation about your specific payment volume, your specific mix of checks vs. electronic, and what a realistic first step looks like.

$2.25cost of a typical check transaction
$0.15cost of a typical ACH transaction
50-70%realistic ACH adoption with self-service enrollment
The call

What happens on the call

No pressure to commit. No multi-week sales cycle required to get useful answers.

01

Map your payment mix

We start with how you pay today — checks, ACH, and anything in between — and where the manual work and fraud exposure sit.

02

See which one fits

We walk through EZPayManager/400 and EZPaySuite against what you're actually running today, and land on the one that matches your setup — not both by default.

03

Leave with a next step

A scoped pilot, a cost estimate for your volume, or simply a clearer picture of what closing the ACH gap actually involves.

Get started

Schedule your strategy session

Cut the cost and risk of paper-based payments without replacing the systems you already run. See how EZPayManager/400 or EZPaySuite fits your specific setup.

  • 15-minute working session, not a sales pitch
  • Speak with someone who works on IBM i payment processing daily
  • No obligation to pick one before you've seen both
Name
Preferred Time
Captures the URL the form was submitted from